logo
SUBSCRIBE
  • Reviews
    • Movie Reviews
    • TV Reviews
  • Originals
    • Bits
    • Facts
    • Rankings
    • Takes
    • Videos
  • Podcast
  • Story
    • The Backstory
    • The Bios
    • The Tenet
Reading: 28 Years Later Review: An Uneven, but Technically Impressive Return to One of the Most Compelling Zombie Franchises in Cinema
Share
Font ResizerAa
The Screen MashThe Screen Mash
Search
  • Reviews
    • Movie Reviews
    • TV Reviews
  • Originals
    • Bits
    • Facts
    • Rankings
    • Takes
    • Videos
  • Podcast
  • Story
    • The Backstory
    • The Bios
    • The Tenet
Follow Us
© The Screen Mash. All Rights Reserved.
HorrorMovie Reviews

28 Years Later Review: An Uneven, but Technically Impressive Return to One of the Most Compelling Zombie Franchises in Cinema

brad lenz
Brad Lenz
June 19, 2025
3 Min Read
28 years later review
3
Rating

I have to admit, I didn’t rewatch the prior two installments before walking into 28 Years Later. In some ways, I think that helped – I was able to approach the film with a clear-eyed view, judging its merits as a standalone effort. 28 Years Later is a movie full of intriguing filmmaking choices and ideas, but it’s also uneven and ultimately incomplete (more on that later).

After 23 years since the original film, Danny Boyle returns to direct and clearly embraces experimentation – from shot composition to camera setups. The most successful of these is the juxtaposition of grainy, handheld footage with stunning extreme wide shots in full resolution. It captures both an aesthetic that honors the originals and a current, contemporary cinematic polish. Less successful is the use of a reported custom rig outfitted with twenty iPhones. 

The intensity of the action sequences using this setup felt greatly diminished and pulled me out of the movie. The cinematography also left me with mixed feelings in certain sequences – you’ll know them when you see them. Though Alex Garland only serves as writer here, it’s easy to spot visual echoes of Ex Machina and Annihilation.

28 Years Later had a surprising amount of emotional depth, though maybe not as hard hitting as the filmmakers believe. Tonally, everything felt very erratic, which dulled any emotional heights the film was trying to reach. There wasn’t enough time given to the central relationship of the film before it resolves, despite Jodie Comer’s best efforts to overcome this in her performance. Ralph Fiennes performance and character, however, was bright spot.

28 Years Later also did not feel like a three-act film, in my opinion. The ending felt like it marked the beginning of a third act, meaning the story felt incomplete by the time the credits roll. Now knowing 28 Years Later is the start of a new trilogy, I see why this is, but still doesn’t excuse the film for ending on a thud.

On balance, 28 Years Later definitely has guts in terms of pure filmmaking, but everything else about it didn’t quite connect in the ways I was really hoping for. Cautiously optimistic of what’s to come.

Rating
3
Rating 3 out of 5 out of 5
TAGGED:Alex GarlandDanny BoyleMovies
Share This Article
Whatsapp Whatsapp Reddit Threads Email Copy Link
Leave a Comment Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

TSM Podcast

Follow Us

Open post by thescreenmash with ID 18130023692496586
the most entertaining thing in ANIMALS 😕

#netflix #benaffleck #kerrywashington #moviescene #moviescenes
Open post by thescreenmash with ID 17974105263136269
Tom Hardy fan here, but Harry in MobLand has to be one of the most bland television characters played by Oscar nominee ever (I enjoy the show btw). 📺

#tomhardy #tv #movies #reels #parody
Open post by thescreenmash with ID 18120829393932537
Alejandro González Iñárritu has had a fascinating career. Every few years the multiple Oscar winner (Birdman, The Revenant) steps in and turns the status quo upside down. His most recent darkly satirical epic starring Tom Cruise, Digger, is polarizing critics and audiences. I think it's a worthwhile cinematic swing that doesn’t totally work. It’s stunningly shot and prescient, but also is a tough pill to swallow, despite the most noble of intentions. Like all of his work, it will be more accurately judged over m the test of time. What do you think about Alejandro González Iñárritu’s filmography?

#movies #film #tomcruise #movienight #director
Open post by thescreenmash with ID 17961220062229586
it's not what you think, IT'S THE CHAIR 😭🍿

#movies #movietheater #funny #sketch #pov
Follow on Instagram

You Might Also Like

primetime movie review
DramaMovie RankingsThriller

Primetime Review: Robert Pattinson Sizzles in this Wildly Entertaining and Darkly Funny 2000s Time Capsule

Read More
heart of the beast movie review
DramaMovie ReviewsThriller

Heart of the Beast Review: Thrilling and Emotional Survival Story With Nothing to Say

Read More
resident evil 2026 movie review
HorrorMovie Reviews

Resident Evil Review: Zach Cregger Breathes New Life Into Video Games and Zombies With Blood-Soaked Fun

Read More
spider-man brand new day movie review
ActionMovie ReviewsSuperhero

Spider-Man: Brand New Day Review: A Much-Needed Return to Form for Marvel

Read More
logo
Follow Us

BARRETT’S LETTERBOXD
BRAD’S LETTERBOXD
FLICK TRACKS PLAYLIST

  • Reviews
    • Movie Reviews
    • TV Reviews
  • Originals
    • Bits
    • Facts
    • Rankings
    • Takes
    • Videos
  • Podcast
  • Story
    • The Backstory
    • The Bios
    • The Tenet

Sign up for exclusive previews of upcoming movies and shows, behind-the-scenes updates, and a weekly digest of highlights.

Subscribe

© The Screen Mash. All Rights Reserved. Site Powered by Kelsey Anne Design.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?